562, 583 Google Scholar (an action on an option), that the doctrine of Tulk v. A much quoted obiter dictum, against the then current of authority, by Jessel, M.R. in this latter case shows that authorities were ignored to procure this result. Google Scholar The instructive Judgment of Scrutton, J. Gomm wrought an immediate change in the law.) See, further, note 14, post. 401) denied it in argument, but the judgment of the Court confirmed it (pp. Google Scholar, this was not completely understood both Eigby L.J. 562, 583 Google Scholar (the action concerned an option, not a restrictive covenant). note 6 That the restriction attaches at once to the covenantor's land and remains attached to it until a purchaser for value acquires a legal estate therein without notice of the restriction, and does not merely arise afresh when the land passes to a purchaser with notice, was explained, obiter, by Jessel, M.R.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |